machineweights

Bobcat E35 vs John Deere 35G

The John Deere 35G is 101 lb (1%) heavier than the Bobcat E35: 7,760 lb (3,520 kg) versus 7,659 lb to 7,893 lb (3,474 kg to 3,580 kg).

Bobcat E35

Operating weight

7,659–7,893lb 3,474–3,580kg 3.47–3.58t

3.83–3.95 US tons, 3.47–3.58 metric tonnes

Transport L × W × H
15 ft 10 in × 5 ft 10 in × 8 ft
Data source
Authorized dealer listing
Last checked
October 6, 2026

John Deere 35G

Operating weight

7,760lb 3,520kg 3.52t

3.88 US tons, 3.52 metric tonnes

Transport L × W × H
15 ft 3 in × 5 ft 9 in × 8 ft 2 in
Data source
Manufacturer spec sheet
Last checked
October 6, 2026

Specifications side by side

Mini excavators: Bobcat E35 and John Deere 35G
SpecBobcat E35John Deere 35G
Operating weight7,659 lb to 7,893 lb7,760 lb (3,520 kg)
Length15 ft 10 in (4.83 m)15 ft 3 in (4.65 m)
Width5 ft 10 in (1.77 m)5 ft 9 in (1.75 m)
Height8 ft (2.44 m)8 ft 2 in (2.49 m)
EngineKubota D1703-M-D1-E4B-BC-2Yanmar 3TNV88F
Power (as published)24.8 hp23.3 hp (17.4 kW)
Max dig depth10 ft 1 in (3.08 m)10 ft (3.05 m)
Max reach at ground17 ft (5.19 m)–
Bucket breakout force7,284 lbf (32.4 kN)6,085 lbf (27.1 kN)
Tail swingZero tail swingZero tail swing
Weight basis–canopy, standard arm, full fuel, 79 kg operator; cab standard arm = 8,135 lb (3,690 kg); cab long arm = 8,715 lb (3,953 kg); canopy long arm = 8,340 lb (3,783 kg)
Ground pressure–4.6 psi (31.7 kPa)
Width basis–undercarriage width (= blade width) 5 ft 9 in (1.74 m)
Track shoe width–12 in (305 mm)
Max reach–17 ft 1 in (5.21 m)

Values come from each model’s own sources; see the model pages for links. Configurations differ, so compare like with like.

Common questions

Which is heavier, the Bobcat E35 or the John Deere 35G?

The John Deere 35G is 101 lb (1%) heavier than the Bobcat E35: 7,760 lb (3,520 kg) versus 7,659 lb to 7,893 lb (3,474 kg to 3,580 kg).

Which is narrower?

The John Deere 35G is narrower: 5 ft 9 in versus 5 ft 10 in.